Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc. v. Legard
| NEVILLE, RODIE AND SHAW, INC. |
| E.A. PRESCOTT LEGARD, As Executor of the Estate of Edwin F. Legard, Jr. |
| 24-537 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Mr. Jonathan D. Jacobson, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/18/2024 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Mr. Fred Weinstein, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/18/2024 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Mr. David W. Rubin, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/18/2024 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant E.A. Prescott Legard, received on 03/15/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 03/18/2024 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/23/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/18/2024 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT RULING AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT, dated 02/16/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/18/2024 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant E.A. Prescott Legard, FILED. [Entered: 03/18/2024 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant E.A. Prescott Legard, district court receipt #ACTDC7682815 , FILED. [Entered: 03/18/2024 12:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
