Quituisaca-Quito v. Garland
| DAVID MAURICIO QUITUISACA-QUITO, LOURDES SUSANA AREVALO-CABRERA and AUSTIN JAEL QUITISACA AREVALO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-59 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Anthony Cardozo Payne, for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, ADDED. [Entered: 01/08/2024 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 6, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/08/2024 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/05/2024 04:08 PM] [Edited: 01/08/2024 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/05/2024 04:05 PM] [Edited: 01/08/2024 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 01/05/2024 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Austin Jael Quitisaca Arevalo, Petitioner David Mauricio Quituisaca-Quito, Petitioner Lourdes Susana Arevalo-Cabrera, USCA receipt # A02-2404-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 01/05/2024 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Austin Jael Quitisaca Arevalo, Petitioner David Mauricio Quituisaca-Quito, Petitioner Lourdes Susana Arevalo-Cabrera, received on 01/03/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 01/05/2024 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/04/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/05/2024 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Austin Jael Quitisaca Arevalo, Petitioner David Mauricio Quituisaca-Quito, Petitioner Lourdes Susana Arevalo-Cabrera, FILED. [Entered: 01/05/2024 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
