Rasmy v. Marriott International, Inc.
| GEBRIAL RASMY |
| MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., DBA JW Marriott Essex House Hotel, ESTRATUE STAMATIS, individually, KAREN DOHERTY, individually, TEHRANI MEHRANI, individually and SESSKON PONGPANTA, individually |
| 24-683 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Gebrial Rasmy, FILED. Service date 03/14/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/14/2024 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 8 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Gebrial Rasmy, FILED. Service date 03/14/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/14/2024 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Gebrial Rasmy, FILED. Service date 03/14/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/14/2024 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTE: See lead case, 24-657, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 CROSS CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Gebrial Rasmy, received on 03/07/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Gebrial Rasmy, district court receipt # ANYSDC-29046156, FILED. [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM ORDER, dated 02/05/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CROSS CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Gebrial Rasmy, FILED. [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
