Doyle v. UBS Financial Services, Inc
| CYNTHIA T. DOYLE, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Peter and Elizabeth C. Tower Foundation, MOLLI T. BYRNES, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Peter and Elizabeth C. Tower Foundation, JAMES WEISS, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Peter and Elizabeth C. Tower Foundation and DAVID WELBOURN, in their Capacities as Trustees of the Peter and Elizabeth C. Tower Foundation |
| UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC, JAY S. BLAIR and JOHN N. BLAIR |
| 24-696 |
| March 14, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CAPTION, edited party text for Plaintiffs-Appellees, AMENDED. [Entered: 03/14/2024 04:51 PM] [Edited: 03/15/2024 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 5 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, James P. Milbrand, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/14/2024 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant UBS Financial Services, Inc, Jay S. Blair, received on 03/08/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 03/14/2024 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant UBS Financial Services, Inc, Jay S. Blair, district court receipt # ANYWDC5124783, FILED. [Entered: 03/14/2024 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 02/23/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/14/2024 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant UBS Financial Services, Inc, Appellant Jay S. Blair, FILED. [Entered: 03/14/2024 02:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
