Friedman v. Bartell
ROBERT JOSEPH FRIEDMAN |
Dr. ABRAHAM BARTELL, UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK and HARVEY BACHMAN |
24-756 |
March 26, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 9, on behalf of Appellant Robert Joseph Friedman, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/27/2024 10:35 AM] |
Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 03/27/2024 09:16 AM] |
Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Lewis Avery Bartell, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/27/2024 08:53 AM] |
Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Leila Cardo, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:48 PM] |
Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Robert Joseph Friedman, received on 03/22/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:37 PM] [Edited: 03/27/2024 10:53 AM] |
Filing 9 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Robert Joseph Friedman, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 03/27/2024 10:17 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:27 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/12/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:21 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 03/12/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:18 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Robert Joseph Friedman, FILED. [Entered: 03/26/2024 04:13 PM] [Edited: 03/27/2024 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.