Islam v. Garland
Petitioner: NAZRUL ISLAM, SHORNOARA BEGUM and NURA BEGUM
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 24-781
Filed: March 28, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2024 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Nazrul Islam, Petitioner Shornoara Begum, Petitioner Nura Begum, FILED. Service date 03/29/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/29/2024 03:47 PM]
March 29, 2024 Filing 9 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Nazrul Islam, Petitioner Shornoara Begum, Petitioner Nura Begum, FILED. Service date 03/29/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/29/2024 03:45 PM]
March 29, 2024 Filing 8 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Nazrul Islam, Petitioner Shornoara Begum, Petitioner Nura Begum, FILED. Service date 03/29/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/29/2024 03:41 PM]
March 28, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 02:26 PM]
March 28, 2024 Filing 6 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 10:40 AM]
March 28, 2024 Filing 5 LETTER, dated 03/28/2024, on behalf of Petitioners Shornoara Begum and Nura Begum in re: clarifying case participants, RECEIVED. Service date 03/28/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/28/2024 10:34 AM]
March 28, 2024 Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Nazrul Islam, Shornoara Begum, Nura Begum, USCA receipt number: A02-2712-ACMS. [Entered: 03/28/2024 10:17 AM]
March 28, 2024 Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Nazrul Islam, Petitioner Shornoara Begum, Petitioner Nura Begum, received on 03/27/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 09:53 AM]
March 27, 2024 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 03/06/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 09:33 AM]
March 27, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Nazrul Islam, Petitioner Nura Begum, Petitioner Shornoara Begum, FILED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 09:33 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Islam v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NAZRUL ISLAM
Represented By: Mahfuzur Rahman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SHORNOARA BEGUM
Represented By: Mahfuzur Rahman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NURA BEGUM
Represented By: Mahfuzur Rahman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Represented By: Oil Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?