Richard v. Fischer
JOHN WILLIS RICHARD |
Ms. DIGNEAN, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, THOMAS TANEA, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of DOCCS, KAREN BELLAMY, Assistant Director of Grievance , DOCS, Ms. Digrean, BRIAN FISCHER, Commissioner DOCS, Lt. GIANNINO, Lieutenant, Five Points Correctinoal Facility, G. GUINEY, Deputy Superintendent of Security, Five Points Correctional Faciility, CHRISTOPHER LINDQUIST, Assistant Director of Grievance, DOCS, JOHN NUTTALL, Deputy Commissioner of Programs, DOCS, N. PARRISH, Educational Supervisor, Five Poins Correctional Facility, THOMAS POOLE, Superintendent of Five Points Correctional Facility, Commissioner, Mr. ALBERT PRACK, Director of Special Housing Unit Program, DOCS and Ms. ZENZEN, Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Five Point Correctional Facility |
24-793 |
March 28, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 06:15 PM] |
Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 03/28/2024 06:09 PM] |
Filing 3 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant John Willis Richard, received on 03/26/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 05:57 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/15/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 05:08 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant John Willis Richard, FILED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 05:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.