Reif v. The Art Institute of Chicago
| AN ARTWORK, RUSSIAN PRISONER OF WAR (1916) |
| TIMOTHY REIF, DAVID FRAENKEL, as Co-Trustee of the Leon Fischer Trust for the Life and Work of Fritz Grunbaum, MILOS VAVRA and THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO |
| 24-809 |
| March 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Luis Li, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/29/2024 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Eric Preston Tuttle, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/29/2024 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellants Timothy Reif, David Fraenkel, Milos Vavra, received on 03/28/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 03/29/2024 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Plaintiffs Timothy Reif, David Fraenkel, Milos Vavra, USCA receipt #ANYSDC-29136502, FILED. [Entered: 03/29/2024 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/19/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/29/2024 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 02/28/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/29/2024 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 11/24/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/29/2024 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellants Timothy Reif, David Fraenkel, Milos Vavra, FILED. [Entered: 03/29/2024 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
