Lin v. Garland
| SU FEI LIN and YASUMI NAGANO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-881 |
| April 5, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 04/08/2024 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Lynda Do in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 04/08/2024 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/08/2024 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 6 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 04/05/2024 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Su Fei Lin, Petitioner Yasumi Nagano, FILED. Service date 04/05/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/05/2024 03:56 PM] [Edited: 04/05/2024 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Su Fei Lin, Yasumi Nagano, USCA receipt number: A02-2758-ACMS. [Entered: 04/05/2024 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Su Fei Lin, Petitioner Yasumi Nagano, received on 04/03/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 04/05/2024 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 03/04/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/05/2024 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Su Fei Lin, Petitioner Yasumi Nagano, FILED. [Entered: 04/05/2024 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
