Moncler v. Neiman Marcus, LLC
| COLD WEATHER MONCLER |
| NEIMAN MARCUS, LLC |
| 24-9053 |
| December 7, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CAPTION, testing, AMENDED. [24-9054, 24-9053] [Entered: 12/08/2024 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY, Bernardo Baruchus, in place of attorney John Jack Jay, Bernardo Baruchus, SUBSTITUTED. [24-9053, 24-9054] [Entered: 12/08/2024 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 MOTION, to expedite appeal, on behalf of Petitioner Cold Weather Moncler, FILED. Service date 12/07/2024 by Federal Express. [Entered: 12/07/2024 08:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Moncler v. Neiman Marcus, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: NEIMAN MARCUS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John Jack Jay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: COLD WEATHER MONCLER | |
| Represented By: | Angela TestAttorney Schelsinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.