Moncler v. Neiman Marcus, LLC
Petitioner: COLD WEATHER MONCLER
Respondent: NEIMAN MARCUS, LLC
Case Number: 24-9053
Filed: December 7, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2024 Filing 3 CAPTION, testing, AMENDED. [24-9054, 24-9053] [Entered: 12/08/2024 01:37 PM]
December 8, 2024 Filing 2 ATTORNEY, Bernardo Baruchus, in place of attorney John Jack Jay, Bernardo Baruchus, SUBSTITUTED. [24-9053, 24-9054] [Entered: 12/08/2024 01:31 PM]
December 7, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION, to expedite appeal, on behalf of Petitioner Cold Weather Moncler, FILED. Service date 12/07/2024 by Federal Express. [Entered: 12/07/2024 08:44 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Moncler v. Neiman Marcus, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: NEIMAN MARCUS, LLC
Represented By: John Jack Jay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: COLD WEATHER MONCLER
Represented By: Angela TestAttorney Schelsinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?