Gomez v. Cullen
JORGE GOMEZ |
GEORGE ROBINSON, J.B. FOSTER, HSA, K. SORRELL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THOMAS CULLEN, D.O, RYAN PARKYN, HSA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. ZALNO, JOHN DOE, FCI Ray Brook Food Service Administrator and John Doe |
24-906 |
April 9, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of J.B. Foster, K. Sorrell, United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 04/10/2024 02:49 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of J.B. Foster, K. Sorrell, United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 04/10/2024 02:47 PM] |
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee J.B. Foster, Appellee K. Sorrell, Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 04/10/2024 by United States Mail. [Entered: 04/10/2024 02:43 PM] |
Filing 7 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 04/09/2024 02:47 PM] |
Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 04/09/2024 02:43 PM] |
Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Jorge Gomez, received on 04/05/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 04/09/2024 02:34 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 04/09/2024 02:29 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/28/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/09/2024 02:15 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 03/28/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/09/2024 02:07 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jorge Gomez, FILED. [Entered: 04/09/2024 01:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.