United States of America v. Reid (Thomas)
| DESHAWN THOMAS, DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE, WALTER LUSTER, NAYA AUSTIN, BRANDON NIEVES, AHMED WALKER, CASWELL SENIOR, BRANDON SOTO, DEZON WASHINGTON, ROBERT WOODS, STEPHEN HUGH, JORDAN INGRAM, SHANAY OUTLAW, ISAIAH SANTOS, ROBERTA SLIGH, BRINAE THORNTON, JAMAL TRENT, JARRETT CRISLER, JR., DONAVAN GILLARD, Don, Dick Wolf, Beagle, Shells, Baby, Untouchable Dot, Ammo, Casanova, Stacks, Blakk, Blakk Rob, Chino, Flow, Easy, Zay, Trouble, Luxury, Trap Smoke, Jayecee and Donnie Love |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-101 |
| January 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 ATTORNEY, Nathan Rehn, in place of attorney Jacob R. Fiddelman, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 03/06/2025 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 19 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 03/05/2025, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 03/05/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/05/2025 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY, Jacob R. Fiddelman, in place of attorney Danielle Renee Sassoon, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 02/18/2025 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 17 NEW CASE MANAGER, Oscar Rivas, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 02/10/2025 07:57 PM] |
| Filing 16 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form B, at entry 14, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, FILED. [Entered: 02/07/2025 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form B, at docket entry 8, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, FILED. [Entered: 02/07/2025 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 14 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, FILED. Service date 02/07/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/07/2025 11:49 AM] [Edited: 02/07/2025 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, FILED. Service date 02/07/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/07/2025 11:47 AM] [Edited: 02/07/2025 12:39 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 02/07/2025, dismissing appeal by 02/21/2025, unless Appellant Deshawn Thomas, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, FILED. [Entered: 02/07/2025 11:09 AM]
|
| Filing 11 STRIKE ORDER, striking Deshawn Thomas Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form at entry number 9 from the docket, FILED. [Entered: 02/07/2025 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 9, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, FILED. [Entered: 02/03/2025 06:40 AM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, FILED. Service date 01/31/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/31/2025 11:21 AM] [Edited: 02/03/2025 06:33 AM] |
| Filing 8 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, FILED. Service date 01/31/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/31/2025 11:19 AM] [Edited: 02/03/2025 06:32 AM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, David Russell Felton for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 01/21/2025 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 01/17/2025 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTE: See lead case, 24-3202, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 01/15/2025 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, received on 01/13/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 01/15/2025 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 01/15/2025 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/23/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/15/2025 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Deshawn Thomas, FILED. [Entered: 01/15/2025 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.