United States of America v. Ji Hu (McMahon)
| FENG ZHU, YONG ZHU, KUANG ZEBIN, MICHAEL MCMAHON, JI HU, MINJUN LI, Johnny Zhu, Jason Zhu, CONGYING ZHENG, LAN TU, Vincent Kuang and YONGQIANG ZHAI |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-1223 |
| May 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 MOTION ORDER, , on behalf of , the Appellants must file their opening briefs by 11/17/2025, by JAC, FILED. [25-121, 25-227, 25-1223] [Entered: 09/04/2025 09:24 AM] [Edited: 10/03/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 32 MOTION ORDER, , on behalf of , Attorney John Vang is appointed as associate CJA counsel at the rate of $100 per hour, by WJN, FILED. [25-121, 25-227, 25-1223] [Entered: 08/15/2025 04:03 PM] [Edited: 08/18/2025 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 31 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Yong Zhu's, Brief due date as 09/17/2025, Appendix due date as 09/17/2025, FILED. [25-121, 25-227, 25-1223] [Entered: 07/14/2025 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 30 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Michael McMahon's, Brief due date as 09/17/2025; Joint Appendix due date as 09/17/2025, FILED. [25-1223, 25-121] [Entered: 07/10/2025 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 29 NEW CASE MANAGER, Christina Palacios, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 06/18/2025 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 28 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, informing Court of proposed due date 09/17/2025, RECEIVED. Service date 06/18/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/18/2025 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 27 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. Service date 06/18/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/18/2025 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 26 ATTORNEY, Lawrence S. Lustberg, for Michael McMahon, TERMINATED. [Entered: 06/17/2025 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 25 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to be relieved as counsel at docket entry 20, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 06/17/2025 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 24 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, at entry 20, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 23 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, at docket entry 21, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. Service date 06/11/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION, to be relieved as counsel, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. Service date 06/10/2025 by ACMS. [25-1223, 25-121] [Entered: 06/10/2025 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION, to be relieved as counsel, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. Service date 06/10/2025 by ACMS. [25-1223, 25-121] [Entered: 06/10/2025 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Letter, at docket entry 18, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 06/09/2025 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 18 LETTER, dated 06/06/2025, requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for Appellant, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, RECEIVED. Service date 06/06/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/06/2025 02:23 PM] [Edited: 06/09/2025 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at entry 14, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 06/06/2025 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at docket entry 13, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 06/06/2025 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Nicholas David Smith for Appellant Michael McMahon, ADDED. [Entered: 06/03/2025 07:35 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 06/02/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 06/01/2025 02:58 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 05/29/2025, dismissing appeal by 06/12/2025, unless the appellant submits the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, FILED. [Entered: 05/29/2025 11:01 AM]
|
| Filing 11 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. Service date 05/28/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/28/2025 05:54 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION ORDER, granting motion, to set due date for appellant's brief based on the LR 31.2 letter to be submitted by Appellant McMahon, at docket entry 28, on behalf of Appellant Yong Zhu, aligning the briefing schedule to allow the parties to prepare a joint appendix and submit their briefs on the same date, FILED. [25-121, 25-227, 25-1223] [Entered: 05/21/2025 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of AppelleeUSA United States of America, FILED. Service date 05/19/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/19/2025 04:09 AM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Meredith A. Arfa, in place of attorney Amy Busa, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 05/16/2025 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 05/13/2025 02:10 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTE: See lead case, 25-121, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 05/12/2025 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, received on 05/09/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 05/12/2025 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, district court receipt #ANYEDC-19036219, FILED. [Entered: 05/12/2025 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/30/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/12/2025 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Michael McMahon, FILED. [Entered: 05/12/2025 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
