United States of America v. Mitchell
Defendant: JOSEPH MITCHELL
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 25-1421
Filed: June 4, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2025 Filing 16 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, FILED. Service date 07/18/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/18/2025 12:03 PM]
July 18, 2025 Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, FILED. Service date 07/18/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/18/2025 12:02 PM]
July 10, 2025 Filing 14 CJA COUNSEL, Randall D. Unger, for Appellant Joseph Mitchell, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 07/10/2025 01:08 PM]
July 10, 2025 Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Randall Douglas Unger, in place of attorney James Egan, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 07/10/2025 01:04 PM]
July 10, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to be relieved as counsel, vacating Appellants briefing deadline, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, FILED. [Entered: 07/10/2025 12:58 PM]
June 30, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION, to be relieved as counsel, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, FILED. Service date 06/30/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/30/2025 10:26 AM]
June 30, 2025 Filing 10 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Joseph Mitchell's Brief due date as 09/26/2025, Appendix due date as 09/26/2025, FILED. [Entered: 06/30/2025 09:25 AM]
June 29, 2025 Filing 9 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, informing Court of proposed due date 09/26/2025, RECEIVED. Service date 06/29/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/29/2025 02:01 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/11/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/11/2025 10:35 AM]
June 9, 2025 Filing 7 NEW CASE MANAGER, Karen Scarangella, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 06/09/2025 02:12 PM]
June 5, 2025 Filing 6 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, FILED. Service date 06/05/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/05/2025 12:19 PM]
June 5, 2025 Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, FILED. Service date 06/05/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/05/2025 12:16 PM]
June 4, 2025 Filing 4 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, received on 06/04/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 06/04/2025 03:18 PM]
June 4, 2025 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/04/2025 03:14 PM]
June 4, 2025 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 06/03/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/04/2025 03:10 PM]
June 4, 2025 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mitchell, FILED. [Entered: 06/04/2025 03:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Rajit Singh Dosanjh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSEPH MITCHELL
Represented By: James Egan
Represented By: Randall Douglas Unger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?