Sreedhar v. Canadian Consulate General
Plaintiff: SRIKANTH SREEDHAR
Defendant: TOM CLARK, Immigration Section, Consulate General of Canada in New York, PARSONS CORPORATION and CANADIAN CONSULATE GENERAL
Case Number: 25-1478
Filed: June 11, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2025 Filing 12 Appellee Canadian Consulate General, TERMINATED. [Entered: 06/12/2025 08:57 AM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, at docket entry 8, on behalf of Appellant Srikanth Sreedhar, copy to pro se appellant and appellees, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 04:15 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Appellant Srikanth Sreedhar, copy to pro se appellant and appellees, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 04:10 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE, to Parsons Corporation, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, copy to pro se appellant and appellees, SENT. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:57 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 8 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Srikanth Sreedhar, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:46 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Srikanth Sreedhar, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:44 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellee, SENT. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:41 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:36 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Srikanth Sreedhar, received on 06/11/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:29 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:26 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 06/02/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:23 PM]
June 11, 2025 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Srikanth Sreedhar, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2025 03:19 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sreedhar v. Canadian Consulate General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SRIKANTH SREEDHAR
Represented By: Srikanth Sreedhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TOM CLARK, Immigration Section, Consulate General of Canada in New York
Represented By: Tom Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PARSONS CORPORATION
Represented By: Parsons Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CANADIAN CONSULATE GENERAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?