Porres-Lara v. Bondi
| BORIS ALEXANDER PORRES-LARA |
| PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 25-1826 |
| July 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 OPPOSITION, to Motion for summary denial of petition, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Petitioner Boris Alexander Porres-Lara, FILED. Service date 08/15/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/15/2025 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 14 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Boris Alexander Porres-Lara, FILED. Service date 08/08/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/08/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Boris Alexander Porres-Lara, FILED. Service date 08/08/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/08/2025 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION, to Motion to hold appeal in abeyance, at docket entry 6, on behalf of Respondent Pamela Bondi, FILED. Service date 08/07/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/07/2025 06:33 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, for summary denial of petition, on behalf of Respondent Pamela Bondi, FILED. Service date 08/07/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/07/2025 06:32 PM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Pamela Bondi, ADDED. [Entered: 07/29/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Neelam Ihsanullah, in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 07/29/2025 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Pamela Bondi, FILED. [Entered: 07/28/2025 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Pamela Bondi, FILED. [Entered: 07/28/2025 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to hold appeal in abeyance, on behalf of Petitioner Boris Alexander Porres-Lara, FILED. Service date 07/28/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/28/2025 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 07/25/2025 05:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Boris Alexander Porres-Lara, USCA receipt # A02-3774-ACMS, received on 07/25/2025, FILED. [Entered: 07/25/2025 05:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Boris Alexander Porres-Lara, received on 07/25/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 07/25/2025 05:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 02/14/2013, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/25/2025 05:37 PM] [Edited: 07/25/2025 05:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Boris Alexander Porres-Lara, FILED. [Entered: 07/25/2025 05:37 PM] [Edited: 07/25/2025 05:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Porres-Lara v. Bondi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BORIS ALEXANDER PORRES-LARA | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Clough |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Oil Oil |
| Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
| Represented By: | Anthony Cardozo Payne |
| Represented By: | Neelam Ihsanullah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
