Burrell v. Bishop
| AKO K. BURRELL |
| BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO, Sergeant BULLOCK, Sergeant GARY, Lieutenant RIEKOR, Sergeant PLONKA, DUTULIO, Correction Officer, DURANT, Correction Officer, MITCHELL, Correction Officer, MENARD, Correction Officer, D. TAYLOR, Correction Officer, DUMAS, Correction Officer, A. MARTIN, Correction Officer, HASTINGS, Correction Officer, MARTINDALE, Correction Officer, BONESTEEL, Correction Officer, BUGAVEY, Correction Officer, MARSHTON, Correction Officer, CHONTOSH, Correction Officer, COOK, Office of Mental Health, JANE DOE #1, Nurse Practitioner, HART, Nurse, HOLOCOMBE, Nurse, JOHN DOE SURGEON, Albany Med, JOHN DOE DOCTOR, Albany Med, Sergeant MERRICK, Sergeant LABARGE, W. BRUEMELLE, Correction Officer, BURROUGHS, Correction Officer and JANE DOE #2, Nurse, Albany Med |
| 25-184 |
| January 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 03/11/2025, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 04/01/2025, unless Appellant Ako K. Burrell, submits a signed Prisoner Authorization Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/11/2025 05:17 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 03/07/2025, dismissing appeal by 03/28/2025, unless Appellant Ako K. Burrell, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/07/2025 02:26 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 03/07/2025, dismissing appeal by 03/28/2025, unless Appellant Ako K. Burrell, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/07/2025 02:17 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 02/12/2025, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 03/05/2025, unless Appellant Ako K. Burrell, submits a Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 02/12/2025 02:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 02/12/2025, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 03/05/2025, unless Appellant Ako K. Burrell, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 02/12/2025 02:02 PM]
|
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellees A. Martin, Bishop, Bonesteel, Bugavey, Bullock, Chontosh, Conto, Cook, D. Taylor, Dumas, Durant, Dutulio, Gary, Hart, Hastings, Holocombe, Locke, Marshton, Martindale, Menard, Mitchell, Plonka, Riekor, FILED. Service date 02/06/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 02/06/2025 04:36 PM] [Edited: 02/06/2025 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Frederick A. Brodie, in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 02/06/2025 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of A. Martin, Bishop, Bonesteel, Bugavey, Bullock, Chontosh, Conto, Cook, D. Taylor, Dumas, Durant, Dutulio, Gary, Hart, Hastings, Holocombe, Locke, Marshton, Martindale, Menard, Mitchell, Plonka, Riekor, FILED. [Entered: 02/06/2025 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 02/01/2025 12:30 AM] |
| Filing 5 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 01/24/2025 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 01/24/2025 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 3 INTERLOCUTORY PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Ako K. Burrell, received on 01/21/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 01/24/2025 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 12/19/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/24/2025 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Ako K. Burrell, FILED. [Entered: 01/24/2025 10:23 AM] [Edited: 01/24/2025 10:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
