Thompson v. Bondi
| YORK ST PATRICK THOMPSON |
| PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 25-1841 |
| July 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 LETTER, dated 09/08/2025, informing the Court that there is currently no administrative record because the Petitioner filed his petition prematurely as indicated on the motion to dismiss, on behalf of Respondent Pamela Bondi, RECEIVED. Service date 09/11/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/11/2025 02:38 PM] [Edited: 09/11/2025 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF AGENCY DEFAULT, for failure to file record on appeal, SENT. [Entered: 09/09/2025 10:26 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION, to dismiss, on behalf of Respondent Pamela Bondi, FILED. Service date 09/02/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/02/2025 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 12 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at entry 11, on behalf of Petitioner York St Patrick Thompson, FILED. [Entered: 08/09/2025 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Petitioner York St Patrick Thompson, FILED. Service date 08/08/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/08/2025 06:43 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 9, on behalf of Petitioner York St Patrick Thompson, FILED. [Entered: 08/08/2025 05:31 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Petitioner York St Patrick Thompson, FILED. Service date 08/08/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/08/2025 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner York St Patrick Thompson, FILED. Service date 08/07/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/07/2025 10:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Karen L Melnik, in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 08/04/2025 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Pamela Bondi, FILED. [Entered: 08/04/2025 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner York St Patrick Thompson, FILED. Service date 07/29/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/29/2025 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 07/29/2025 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner York St Patrick Thompson, received on 07/25/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 07/29/2025 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 05/12/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/29/2025 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner York St Patrick Thompson, FILED. [Entered: 07/29/2025 09:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thompson v. Bondi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: YORK ST PATRICK THOMPSON | |
| Represented By: | Zoey Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Oil Oil |
| Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
| Represented By: | Karen L Melnik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
