Pettus v. Thompson
Petitioner: JAMES PETTUS
Respondent: COLETTE THOMPSON, CHARLENE THOMPSON, AVERY PETTUS and TYLER PETTUS
Case Number: 25-1866
Filed: July 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: CIVIL RIGHTS-Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2025 Filing 10 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 10/29/2025, determining the appeal to SDNY, copy sent to pro se appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate] [25-1866, 25-2058] [Entered: 10/29/2025 01:45 PM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for leave to file at docket entry 6, denying motion for leave to file at docket entry 11, on behalf of Petitioner James Pettus, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED. [25-1866, 25-2058] [Entered: 10/29/2025 01:39 PM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 8 LEAVE TO APPEAL, pursuant to court order, dated 10/29/2025, DENIED. [25-1866, 25-2058] [Entered: 10/29/2025 01:25 PM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 7 NEW CASE MANAGER, Atasha Joseph, ASSIGNED. [25-1866, 25-2058] [Entered: 10/29/2025 11:37 AM]
August 8, 2025 Filing 6 REDACTED MOTION, for leave to file, on behalf of Petitioner James Pettus, FILED. Service date 08/07/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 08/13/2025 02:16 PM]
July 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER, dated 07/31/2025, dismissing appeal by 08/21/2025, unless Petitioner James Pettus, submits a motion for leave to file, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 07/31/2025 01:14 PM] [Edited: 07/31/2025 05:02 PM]
July 31, 2025 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 07/31/2025 12:51 PM]
July 31, 2025 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/22/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/31/2025 12:41 PM]
July 31, 2025 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 07/21/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/31/2025 12:40 PM]
July 31, 2025 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Petitioner James Pettus, filed in the district court on 07/28/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/31/2025 12:37 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pettus v. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES PETTUS
Represented By: James Pettus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: COLETTE THOMPSON
Represented By: Colette Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHARLENE THOMPSON
Represented By: Charlene Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: AVERY PETTUS
Represented By: Avery Pettus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TYLER PETTUS
Represented By: Tyler Pettus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?