Rogers v. Target Corp.
Plaintiff: JOSHUA ROGERS
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Case Number: 25-2208
Filed: September 15, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: CIVIL RIGHTS-Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2025 Filing 16 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 10/17/2025, determining the appeal to SDNY, copy to pro se Appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 12/11/2025 11:03 AM]
November 19, 2025 Filing 15 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 11/19/2025 09:43 AM]
November 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER, entry number 13, appeal dismissed for Appellant's failure to pay fee, EFFECTIVE. [Entered: 11/19/2025 09:41 AM]
October 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER, dated 10/17/2025, dismissing this appeal by 11/07/2025, unless Appellant Joshua Rogers submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 10/17/2025 12:08 PM]
October 9, 2025 Filing 12 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Joshua Rogers Motion to proceed in forma pauperis at entry number 7 from the docket, FILED. [Entered: 10/09/2025 02:58 PM]
September 30, 2025 Filing 11 NOTICE, to Appelle Target Corporation, for failure to file an appearance, SENT. [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:59 PM]
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, dated 09/30/2025, dismissing this appeal by 10/21/2025, unless Appellant Joshua Rogers submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of appearance, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:49 PM]
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER, dated 09/30/2025, dismissing this appeal by 10/21/2025, unless Appellant Joshua Rogers submits Form D-P, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 09/30/2025 02:23 PM]
September 15, 2025 Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Appellant Joshua Rogers, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 09/15/2025 01:07 PM]
September 15, 2025 Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se, SENT. [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:47 PM] [Edited: 09/15/2025 04:01 PM]
September 15, 2025 Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Joshua Rogers, received on 09/12/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:44 PM]
September 12, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Joshua Rogers, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:58 PM]
September 12, 2025 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:39 PM]
September 12, 2025 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/08/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:35 PM]
September 12, 2025 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 07/01/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:34 PM]
September 12, 2025 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joshua Rogers, FILED. [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rogers v. Target Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSHUA ROGERS
Represented By: Joshua Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Represented By: Mitchell B. Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?