United States of America v. Ball
| TERRY BALL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-2655 |
| October 23, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MOTION, for summary affirmance, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 03/11/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/11/2026 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 16 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellee United States of America's, Brief due date as 05/04/2026, FILED. [Entered: 02/10/2026 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 15 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, informing Court of proposed due date 05/04/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 02/10/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/10/2026 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Joshua Rothenberg for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 02/04/2026 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 02/04/2026 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPENDIX, volume 1 of 1, (pp. 1 - 134), on behalf of Appellant Terry Ball, FILED. Service date 02/02/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 11 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Terry Ball, FILED. Service date 02/02/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 10 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Terry Ball's, Brief due date as 02/02/2026; Joint Appendix due date as 02/02/2026, FILED. [Entered: 11/03/2025 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 9 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Terry Ball, informing Court of proposed due date 02/02/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 11/03/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 11/03/2025 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/31/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 7 NEW CASE MANAGER, Christina Palacios, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 10/29/2025 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Terry Ball, FILED. Service date 10/27/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 10/27/2025 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Terry Ball, FILED. Service date 10/27/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 10/27/2025 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Terry Ball, OPENED. [Entered: 10/23/2025 04:28 PM] [Edited: 10/27/2025 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 10/23/2025 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/21/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/23/2025 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Timothy Ball, FILED. [Entered: 10/23/2025 04:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Ball | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Rajit Singh Dosanjh |
| Represented By: | Joshua Rothenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TERRY BALL | |
| Represented By: | James Egan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
