Keith v. United States of America
| DAVID KEITH |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-2779 |
| November 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Sentence (2255) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for certificate of appealability at docket entry 8, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, by DJ, RCW, ECL, and dismissing the appeal, copy to pro se Appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/18/2026 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 15 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 03/18/2026 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 14 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant David Keith's Motion for paper copy at entry number 11 from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 01/27/2026 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENTARY PAPERS TO MOTION for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, FILED. Service date 12/15/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 12/30/2025 07:08 PM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for paper copy, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 12/01/2025 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, for paper copy, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, FILED. Service date 11/17/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 11/26/2025 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, FILED. Service date 11/17/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 11/26/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, FILED. Service date 11/17/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 11/26/2025 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, FILED. Service date 11/17/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 11/26/2025 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Mostafa Khairy for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 11/12/2025 08:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 11/12/2025 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 11/03/2025 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, OPENED. [Entered: 11/03/2025 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 11/03/2025 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 09/26/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/03/2025 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant David Keith, FILED. [Entered: 11/03/2025 10:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Keith v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DAVID KEITH | |
| Represented By: | David Keith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Rehn |
| Represented By: | Mostafa Khairy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
