Toland v. Walsh
| CHARLES W. TOLAND, JR. |
| JAMES J. WALSH, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility |
| 25-2965 |
| November 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE, Case Status, SENT. [Entered: 01/28/2026 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 12 PAPERS, motion for reconsideration, on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/28/2026 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER, dated 01/14/2026, requesting a copy of the letter dated 12/29/2025, (Entry 10) on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., RECEIVED. No service date. [Entered: 01/21/2026 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER, dated 12/29/2025, requesting a copy of the public docket sheet, and he was never served with a copy of the opposition from the Attorney General, on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., RECEIVED. No service date. [Entered: 01/08/2026 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 12/16/2025, determining the appeal to NDNY (SYRACUSE), copy sent to pro se appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 01/06/2026 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION ORDER, denying as moot motion motion for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive habeas petition, on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., copy sent to prose appellant, FILED. [Entered: 12/18/2025 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ralph Obas, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 12/16/2025 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for leave to file a successive at docket entry 1, on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., by JAC, BDP, RJL, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 12/16/2025 11:23 AM] [Edited: 12/16/2025 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION, for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second successive habeas petition, on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., FILED. Service date 12/05/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 12/12/2025 06:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., FILED. Service date 12/05/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 12/12/2025 06:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 11/21/2025 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION, for Second or Successive habeas petition, on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., OPENED. [Entered: 11/21/2025 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, MOTION for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive application, on behalf of Petitioner Charles W. Toland, Jr., FILED. [Entered: 11/21/2025 02:16 PM] [Edited: 11/21/2025 02:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Toland v. Walsh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CHARLES W. TOLAND, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Charles W. Toland, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JAMES J. WALSH, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility | |
| Represented By: | Barbara D. Underwood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
