United States of America v. Ogman
| KENNETH STURDIVANT, DERRICK BROCK, LAMONT REED, DONALD OGMAN, ROMELL BROWN, ANAJE AMIN, CORNELL STREATER, EDWARD PREZIOSO, CODY BELANGER, WAYNE WRIGHT, ALPHONZO DIXON, MARVIN OGMAN, MARVIN HOWARD, CHARLES HART, RICHARD MASON, CLAYTON CARNEY, DEANDRE BARNES, JANARLEEN BORIA, JAROD AARON, MATTHEW SPEARMAN, Slay, Easy, LWop, Manny O, Main, Rell, Dice, Messy, WuLoc, Forty, Cruger, Fonz, Bub Love, Marv, O.G., Rich, Hardcore, DMan, Jan, Janariene Boria, J Rock, Little J. Rock, Shiest and Shiesty |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-3082 |
| December 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Employee Retirement |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 02/06/2026, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 02/06/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/06/2026 04:15 PM] [Edited: 02/06/2026 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 17 NEW CASE MANAGER, Jessica McKenzie, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 01/12/2026 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 16 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, FILED. Service date 01/06/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/06/2026 04:10 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER, dated 12/31/2025, dismissing this appeal by 01/14/2026, unless Appellant Donald Ogman files Form B, FILED. [Entered: 12/31/2025 10:36 AM]
|
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Stephanie Tsay Levick for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 12/30/2025 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 12/30/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, FILED. Service date 12/22/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/22/2025 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 11 CJA COUNSEL, Ian Howard Marcus Amelkin, for Donald Ogman, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 12/16/2025 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Ian Howard Marcus Amelkin, in place of attorney David A. Moraghan, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/16/2025 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION ORDER, granting motion for appointment of CJA counsel, to be relieved as counsel at docket entry 6, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, Ian H. Marcus Amelkin, Law Office of Ian H. Marcus Amelkin, Esq. PLLC, 52 Duane Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10007, is assigned as new counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. 3006A. Attorney Amelkin is directed to review Local Rule 31.2 regarding procedures for setting the filing dates for the submission of briefs, FILED. [Entered: 12/16/2025 03:50 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER, directing appeals 25-3082 and 25-3076 to be heard in tandem, FILED. [Entered: 12/10/2025 04:19 PM]
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for appointment of CJA counsel, to be relieved as counsel, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, FILED. Service date 12/10/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/10/2025 03:55 PM] [Edited: 12/10/2025 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, for appointment of CJA counsel, to be relieved as counsel, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, FILED. Service date 12/10/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/10/2025 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, FILED. Service date 12/10/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/10/2025 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 12/09/2025 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, OPENED. [Entered: 12/09/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/07/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/09/2025 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Donald Ogman, FILED. [Entered: 12/09/2025 08:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.