Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
| ALEXIS DAVIS |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| 25-3143 |
| December 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| SOC SEC-DIWW (42 USC 405(g)) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 MOTION ORDER, denying as moot motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 14, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 05/26/2026 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 27 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 02/13/2026, determining the appeal to EDNY(BROOKLYN), copy to pro se Appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 05/22/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 26 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 05/01/2026 11:46 AM] |
Filing 25
ORDER, entry number 24, appeal dismissed for Appellant's failure to file Form D-P, EFFECTIVE. [Entered: 05/01/2026 11:43 AM]
|
Filing 24
ORDER, dated 02/13/2026, dismissing this appeal by 03/06/2026, unless Appellant Alexis Davis submits Form D-P, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 02/13/2026 12:22 PM]
|
Filing 23
ORDER, dated 02/13/2026, dismissing this appeal by 03/06/2026, unless Appellant Alexis Davis submits an Acknowledgment and notice of Appearance, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 02/13/2026 12:14 PM]
|
| Filing 22 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Alexis Davis Form D-P at entry number 13 from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 02/13/2026 11:58 AM] [Edited: 03/13/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 21 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Alexis Davis Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form at entry number 12 from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 02/13/2026 11:50 AM] [Edited: 03/13/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at entry 14, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, FILED. [Entered: 01/28/2026 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for motion to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, FILED. Service date 01/12/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 01/21/2026 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 14, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FORM D-P, at docket entry 13, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, copy to pro se appelllant, FILED. [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 12, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 15 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, informing Court of proposed due date 12/22/2025, RECEIVED. Service date 12/30/2025 by No Service. [Entered: 12/30/2025 07:57 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, FILED. Service date 12/30/2025 by No Service. [Entered: 12/30/2025 07:54 PM] [Edited: 01/28/2026 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, FILED. Service date 12/30/2025 by No Service. [Entered: 12/30/2025 07:37 PM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, FILED. Service date 12/30/2025 by No Service. [Entered: 12/30/2025 07:31 PM] |
| Filing 11 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 12/29/2025 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 12/16/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/16/2025 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Molly E. Carter, in place of attorney Varuni Nelson, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/16/2025 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. [Entered: 12/15/2025 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 12/15/2025 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE, re: pending district court IFP motion, to district court, SENT. [Entered: 12/15/2025 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, OPENED. [Entered: 12/15/2025 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 12/15/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/04/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/15/2025 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 12/01/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/15/2025 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Alexis Davis, FILED. [Entered: 12/15/2025 08:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ALEXIS DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | Alexis Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
| Represented By: | Varuni Nelson |
| Represented By: | Molly E. Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.