Jorgensen v. Lynch & Newman Law
| JOHN SCOTT JORGENSEN |
| LYNCH & NEWMAN LAW, ROBERT GREGORY LAW FIRM, JOHN LYNCH, PETER JORGENSEN, ROBERT GREGORY, MATT NEWMAN and KATHY JORGENSEN |
| 25-3249 |
| December 31, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CONTRACT-Other Contract Action |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 02/03/2026, determining the appeal to EDNY (CENTRAL ISLIP), copy sent to pro se appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 05/27/2026 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 35 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ralph Obas, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 05/04/2026 11:28 AM] [Edited: 05/05/2026 09:38 AM] |
Filing 34
ORDER, [17] appeal dismissed for Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, failure to file form D-P, EFFECTIVE. [Entered: 05/04/2026 11:26 AM]
|
| Filing 33 PAPERS, regarding estate, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/01/2026 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 32 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant John Scott Jorgensen Form D-P, at entry number 23, 27 from the docket, FILED. [Entered: 04/20/2026 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 31 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant John Scott Jorgensen Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form at entry number 22 from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/31/2026 10:27 AM] [Edited: 03/31/2026 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 30 PAPERS, copy of District Court 59(e) motion, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/12/2026 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 29 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, at docket entry 27, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, FILED. [Entered: 03/11/2026 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 28 PAPERS, District Court status letter and copies of certificate of service for entry 45 in the District Court, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/11/2026 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 27 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, FILED. Service date 03/10/2026 by No Service. [Entered: 03/11/2026 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 26 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, at docket entry 23, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, FILED. [Entered: 02/24/2026 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 25 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 22, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, FILED. [Entered: 02/24/2026 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 24 PAPERS, duplicate stay status letter and default orders, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/20/2026 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 23 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, FILED. Service date 12/29/2025 by Hand Delivery. [Entered: 02/20/2026 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, FILED. Service date 12/29/2025 by Hand Delivery. [Entered: 02/20/2026 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 21 ATTORNEY, John Tyler Mills for Appellee Robert Gregory, Appellee Robert Gregory Law Firm, ADDED. [Entered: 02/19/2026 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Robert Gregory, Robert Gregory Law Firm, FILED. [Entered: 02/18/2026 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY, David Oxamendi for Appellee Robert Gregory, Appellee Robert Gregory Law Firm, TERMINATED. [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:37 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER, dated 02/03/2026, dismissing this appeal by 02/24/2026, unless Appellant John Scott Jorgenson submits Form D-P, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:34 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER, dated 02/03/2026, dismissing this appeal by 02/24/2026, unless Appellant John Scott Jorgensen submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:22 PM]
|
| Filing 19 STAY STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 02/01/2026, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, alerting court that no opposition has been filed, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/04/2026 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 15 LETTER, dated 01/30/2026, advising that she does not wish to participate in appeal, on behalf of Appellee Kathy Jorgensen, RECEIVED. Service date 01/30/2026 by No Service. [Entered: 02/02/2026 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 14 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 01/15/2026, to EDNY (CENTRAL ISLIP), ISSUED. [Entered: 01/15/2026 10:51 AM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER, lifting the FRAP 4(a)4 stay of appeal in 25-3249, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 01/15/2026 10:47 AM]
|
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Lynch & Newman Law, Appellee John Lynch, Appellee Matt Newman, FILED. Service date 01/14/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/14/2026 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 11 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 01/07/2026 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 10 FRAP 4(a)4 NOTICE, to John Scott Jorgensen, copy to EDNY (Central Islip), SENT. [Entered: 01/06/2026 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, David Oxamendi, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellee Kathy Jorgensen, SENT. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 6 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, OPENED. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, district court receipt #200006312, FILED. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/01/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/01/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant John Scott Jorgensen, FILED. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
