United States of America v. Mohammad Saleh
| MULLAH BAKSH GHULAM MOHAMMAD SALEH and Sealed Defendant 1 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-392 |
| February 20, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 ATTORNEY, Ashok Chandran for Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, ADDED. [Entered: 03/19/2025 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, FILED. [Entered: 03/19/2025 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 19 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh Brief due date as 05/27/2025; Joint Appendix due date as 05/27/2025, FILED. [Entered: 03/13/2025 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 18 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 scheduling notification, at entry 16, on behalf of Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, FILED. [Entered: 03/13/2025 10:29 AM] [Edited: 03/13/2025 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 scheduling notification, at docket entry 14, on behalf of Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, FILED. [Entered: 03/13/2025 10:28 AM] [Edited: 03/13/2025 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 16 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, informing Court of proposed due date 05/27/2025, RECEIVED. Service date 03/13/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/13/2025 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 15 NEW CASE MANAGER, Christina Palacios, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 03/12/2025 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 14 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, informing Court of proposed due date 06/09/2025, RECEIVED. Service date 03/10/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/10/2025 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Nathan Rehn, in place of attorney Jacob R. Fiddelman, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 03/06/2025 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Kaylan Lasky for AppelleeUSA United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 07:26 PM] |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY, Matthew Brady Larsen for Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, ADDED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 07:24 PM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Alexander Nuo Li for AppelleeUSA United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 07:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, FILED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 7 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, FILED. Service date 02/24/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/24/2025 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, FILED. Service date 02/24/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/24/2025 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 02/21/2025 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 02/21/2025 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 3 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, received on 02/19/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 02/20/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 01/17/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/20/2025 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Mullah Baksh Ghulam Mohammad Saleh, FILED. [Entered: 02/20/2025 01:35 PM] [Edited: 02/20/2025 01:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
