Fishman v. City of New Rochelle
| MARC H. FISHMAN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE, NEW ROCHELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Police Officer LANE SCHLESINGER, Shield No. 1058, Commissioner JOSEPH F. SCHALLER, Police Detective W. JOSEPH, Shield No. 18, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, ROBERT GAZZOLA, in his official capacity as Police Commissioner of the City of New Rochelle Police Department and Sergeant MYRON JOSEPH, Shield #18 |
| 25-423 |
| February 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at docket entry 19, on behalf of Appellant Marc H. Fishman, FILED. [Entered: 04/23/2025 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Marc H. Fishman, FILED. [Entered: 04/22/2025 09:43 PM] |
| Filing 18 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ronald Willoughby, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 03/26/2025 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 17 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Marc H. Fishman, district court receipt # NYSDCLERK2500089, FILED. [Entered: 03/17/2025 05:50 PM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Marc H. Fishman, FILED. Service date 03/14/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 03/17/2025 05:48 PM] |
| Filing 15 PAPERS, Appellant's wire transfer documents for payment of $605, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/17/2025 10:22 AM] |
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 03/11/2025, dismissing appeal by 04/01/2025, unless Appellant Marc H. Fishman, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED [Entered: 03/11/2025 04:56 PM]
|
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 03/11/2025, dismissing appeal by 04/01/2025, unless Appellant Marc H. Fishman, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis status, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/11/2025 04:51 PM]
|
| Filing 12 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 11, on behalf of Appellee City of New Rochelle, FILED. [Entered: 03/04/2025 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee City of New Rochelle, FILED. Service date 03/03/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/04/2025 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 9, on behalf of Appellee City of New Rochelle, FILED. [Entered: 03/03/2025 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee City of New Rochelle, FILED. Service date 02/25/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/25/2025 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Marc H. Fishman, FILED. Service date 02/18/2025 by Federal Express. [Entered: 02/25/2025 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 02/24/2025 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Peter Alexander Meisels, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Marc H. Fishman, received on 02/21/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 01/22/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 01/22/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Marc H. Fishman, FILED. [Entered: 02/24/2025 04:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.