United States of America v. Sutton
| DARRIUS SUTTON, TRAVA SELBY, ANDREW SIMPSON, TYSHAWN SUMPTER, RONNIE WARREN, COREY WILLIAMS, Darius Sutton, Blizz Meecho, Stoney, Drew, Drewski, GT, Bamalife GT, Bossman Horse, Horse, Moncler, Moncler Mellz and Mellz |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-427 |
| February 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER, dated 03/26/2025, directing that counsel for the Appellant must file a response to the motion to dismiss that complies with the requirements set forth in United States v. Gomez-Perez, 215 F.3d 315 (2d Cir. 2000). The response must be filed no later than the date Appellant set as the due date of his principal brief, FILED. [Entered: 03/26/2025 04:12 PM] [Edited: 03/26/2025 05:17 PM]
|
| Filing 21 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Darrius Sutton, FILED. Service date 03/26/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/26/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Darrius Sutton, FILED. Service date 03/26/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/26/2025 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 19 ATTORNEY, Susan Corkery for AppelleeUSA United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 03/26/2025 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION, to dismiss, on behalf of AppelleeUSA United States of America, FILED. Service date 03/26/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/26/2025 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 03/26/2025 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 16 CJA COUNSEL, Randa Dea Maher for Appellant Darrius Sutton, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 03/17/2025 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Randa Dea Maher for Appellant Darrius Sutton, ADDED. [Entered: 03/17/2025 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Deborah A. Colson for Appellant Darrius Sutton, TERMINATED. [Entered: 03/17/2025 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to be relieved as counsel, at docket entry 12. Randa D. Maheron is assigned as new counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. 3006A, on behalf of Appellant Darrius Sutton, FILED. [Entered: 03/17/2025 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION, to be relieved as counsel, on behalf of Appellant Darrius Sutton, FILED. Service date 03/12/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/12/2025 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of AppelleeUSA United States of America, FILED. Service date 03/03/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/03/2025 11:40 PM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, David L. Axelrod for Appellee United States of America, TERMINATED. [Entered: 02/28/2025 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Nicholas Michael Axelrod for AppelleeUSA United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 02/28/2025 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Sophia Suarez for AppelleeUSA United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 02/27/2025 09:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, David L. Axelrod, in place of attorney Amy Busa, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 02/27/2025 09:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 02/25/2025 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Darrius Sutton, received on 02/24/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 02/25/2025 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/12/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/25/2025 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Darrius Sutton, FILED. [Entered: 02/25/2025 09:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.