Cleer LLC v. Stranger
| DAVID MCKEEGAN, CARRIE MCKEEGAN and OPTIC TAX INC. |
| CLEER LLC, Greenback Business Services LLC and CRYSTAL STRANGER, - |
| 25-663 |
| March 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 07/14/2025, determining the appeal to DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN), copy to pro se appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate] [25-530, 25-663] [Entered: 08/28/2025 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 29 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for reconsideration/reconsideration en banc at docket entry 28, denying motion for reconsideration/reconsideration en banc at docket entry 60, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, FILED. [25-530, 25-663] [Entered: 08/21/2025 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 28 MOTION, for reconsideration/reconsideration en banc, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, FILED. Service date 07/30/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/30/2025 12:47 PM] [Edited: 07/30/2025 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 27 NEW CASE MANAGER, Khadijah Young, ASSIGNED. [25-530, 25-663] [Entered: 07/14/2025 04:55 PM] [Edited: 07/14/2025 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 26 MOTION ORDER, denying motion to stay the district court proceedings at docket entry 23, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger; and the appeal is dismissed, by RJS, MHP, SJM, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 07/14/2025 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 25 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellee Cleer LLC, FILED. Service date 06/27/2025 by ACMS. [25-663, 25-530] [Entered: 06/27/2025 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 24 LETTER, dated 06/23/2025, informing the Court of recent material development in the underlying district court action. In addition, the Appellant respectfully requests an immediate, limited stay of the domain transfer provision only. Such relief is necessary to preserve the jurisdiction of this Court and to ensure meaningful appellate review, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, RECEIVED. Service date 06/23/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/23/2025 10:11 AM] [Edited: 06/23/2025 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 23 MOTION, to stay the district court proceedings, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, FILED. Service date 06/20/2025 by ACMS. [25-663, 25-530] [Entered: 06/20/2025 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 22 BRIEF & APPENDIX, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, FILED. Service date 05/30/2025 by ACMS. [25-663, 25-530] [Entered: 05/30/2025 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 21 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, FILED. Service date 05/30/2025 by ACMS. [25-663, 25-530] [Entered: 05/30/2025 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 18, on behalf of Appellee Cleer LLC, FILED. [Entered: 04/10/2025 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at docket entry 17, on behalf of Appellee Cleer LLC, FILED. [Entered: 04/10/2025 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Cleer LLC, FILED. Service date 04/10/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/10/2025 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cleer LLC, FILED. [Entered: 04/10/2025 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE, to Appellee Cleer LLC, for failure to file an appearance, SENT. [Entered: 04/10/2025 12:54 AM] |
| Filing 15 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 04/08/2025, to District Court of Connecticut (New Haven), ISSUED. [25-530, 25-663] [Entered: 04/08/2025 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION ORDER, for a partial stay pending appeal to a three-judge motions panel. To the extent Appellant requests a temporary or immediate stay pending decision by the panel, that request is denied, at docket entry , on behalf of , by MAK, FILED. [25-530, 25-663] [Entered: 04/08/2025 04:48 PM] [Edited: 04/08/2025 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 LETTER, dated 03/27/2025, informing the Court regarding jurisdiction of appeal, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, RECEIVED. Service date 03/27/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/27/2025 06:18 AM] [Edited: 03/27/2025 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, FILED. Service date 03/27/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/27/2025 05:54 AM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, FILED. Service date 03/27/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/27/2025 05:46 AM] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 03/24/2025 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTE: See lead case, 25-530, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 03/21/2025 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, George Musekamp, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 03/21/2025 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 03/21/25, to District of Connecticut (New Haven), ISSUED. [Entered: 03/21/2025 01:06 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER, dated 03/21/2025, directing Appellant Crystal Springer to file a response on or before 04/04/2025, by letter either (1) setting out the claimed basis for this Court's jurisdiction; or (2) withdrawing the appeal, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2025 01:01 PM]
|
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 03/21/2025 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, OPENED. [Entered: 03/21/2025 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, district court receipt # 27MKJPA1, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2025 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 03/20/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/21/2025 12:31 PM] [Edited: 03/21/2025 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Crystal Stranger, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2025 12:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
