Sadigh v. United States of America
| JILLBERT SADIGH, DANIEL GIBOK KYANG, Twin Flame and I.R.P., Minor |
| NYPD Officer ANDREW BUTLER, #2369, NYPD Officer NICHOLAS DELLAVECCHIA, #1569, FDNY ALEXIR RAMOS, JR., #3981, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NEW YORK STATE, NEW YORK STATE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Administration of Children's Service, NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, President JOE BIDEN, UNITED STATES MILITARY, FDNY, QUEENS FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER, QUEENS FAMILY COURT, EMS MEDICAL CONTROL, METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, INTERNAL AFFAIRS, NORTHWELL HEALTH, INC., LIJ MEDICAL CENTER, ZUCKER HILLSIDE HOSPITAL, QUEENS HOSPITAL CENTER, ELMHURST GENERAL HOSPITAL, JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, MOUNT SINAI MORNINGSIDE, SAFE HORIZON, INC., UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, UNITED STATES ARMY, UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL FORCES, UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS, UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES NAVY, Dr. A QUYYUM, SHARMEEN SULTANA, SYED HASSAN, CARL GOODRICH, DANIEL KESTELMAN, ASMAA IBRAHIM HASSAN, DEEP LOHIA, GAYATHRI MAHENDIRAN, HEIN LATT, JAMUNA THEVENTHIRAN, TYRONE RODMAN, VASCHELE WILLIAMS, VIMALA SIM, SHAMAIL IDREES, SHI YUN LI, MARTHA EDELMAN, 103RD PRECINCT, RENUKA ANANTHAMOORTHY, ANNAFI CHOWDHURY, JOHN P. MALOY, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and D. KENDRA BRIGGS, Justice Supreme Court Queens County |
| 25-880 |
| April 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 05/05/2025, determining the appeal to EDNY, copy to pro se Appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 06/27/2025 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 12 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 06/06/2025 03:55 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER, entry number 8, appeal dismissed for appellant's failure to pay fee, EFFECTIVE. [Entered: 06/06/2025 03:52 PM]
|
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 05/05/2025, dismissing this appeal by 5/27/2025, unless Appellant Jillbert Sadigh, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 05/05/2025 11:52 AM]
|
Filing 9
ORDER, dated 05/05/2025, dismissing this appeal by 5/27/2025, unless Appellant Jillbert Sadigh, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 05/05/2025 11:47 AM]
|
Filing 8
ORDER, dated 05/05/2025, dismissing this appeal by 5/27/2025, unless Appellant Jillbert Sadigh, submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 05/05/2025 11:41 AM]
|
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Muriel Goode-Trufant for NYPD Officer Andrew Butler, #2369, NYPD Officer Nicholas Dellavecchia, #1569, FDNY Alexir Ramos, Jr., #3981, D. Kendra Briggs, Justice Supreme Court Queens County, TERMINATED. [Entered: 04/17/2025 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER, dated 04/16/2025, requesting to terminate counsel, on behalf of NYPD Officer Andrew Butler, #2369, NYPD Officer Nicholas Dellavecchia, #1569, FDNY Alexir Ramos, Jr., #3981, D. Kendra Briggs, Justice Supreme Court Queens County,, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/17/2025 11:28 AM] [Edited: 04/17/2025 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 04/14/2025 07:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Jillbert Sadigh, received on 04/11/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 04/14/2025 07:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 04/15/2025 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 03/05/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/14/2025 07:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jillbert Sadigh, FILED. [Entered: 04/14/2025 07:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.