Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin
| CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE SA, ABC and LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER |
| XIAOLIU WANG, XIAOLE LIN, XINGYUN HU, DEF, TIMI GIFT SHOP INC., SHUN MIAO DING, GUO LIN HAN, XIAOWEI GAO, MING LI, XIUQIAN CHI, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-100, FEI Y LU, YONGCHAN ZHANG, CAI QIN XIE, Li Li Wang, GUO L HUANG, YU HOU QU and MEI LEE |
| 26-1029 |
| April 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PROPERTY RIGHTS-Trademark |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Xiaole Lin, Appendix due date as 07/27/2026, Brief due date as 07/27/2026, FILED. [26-1029, 26-976] [Entered: 05/13/2026 04:09 PM] [Edited: 06/09/2026 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 31 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Xiaole Lin, informing Court of proposed due date 07/27/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 05/11/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/11/2026 10:21 PM] |
| Filing 30 ATTORNEY, Apratim Vidyarthi, Howard S. Hogan, for Appellee Louis Vuitton Malletier, ADDED. ATTORNEY, Sara Gates for Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, ADDED. [Entered: 05/08/2026 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 29 NEW CASE MANAGER, Sandra Balbuena, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 05/08/2026 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Christian Dior Couture SA, FILED. [Entered: 05/08/2026 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Louis Vuitton Malletier, FILED. [Entered: 05/07/2026 06:53 PM] |
| Filing 26 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Louis Vuitton Malletier, FILED. [Entered: 05/07/2026 06:38 PM] |
| Filing 25 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Louis Vuitton Malletier, FILED. Service date 05/07/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/07/2026 06:20 PM] |
| Filing 24 ATTORNEY, Robert Weigel, in place of attorney Robert M. Wasnofski, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 05/07/2026 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 23 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 18, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, FILED. [Entered: 05/07/2026 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 22 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Letter, at entry 17, on behalf of Appellee Louis Vuitton Malletier, FILED. [Entered: 05/07/2026 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 21 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Letter, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, Appellee Louis Vuitton Malletier, FILED. [Entered: 05/07/2026 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Louis Vuitton Malletier, FILED. [Entered: 05/06/2026 04:14 PM] [Edited: 05/07/2026 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 19 CAMP ORDER, Type of Conference: Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 07/02/2026, Start Time: 10:30 AM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Mediator Kathleen M. Scanlon, ENTERED. [Entered: 05/06/2026 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, FILED. Service date 05/06/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/06/2026 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 17 LETTER, dated 05/06/2026, requesting to terminate counsel, on behalf of Appellee Louis Vuitton Malletier, RECEIVED. Service date 05/06/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/06/2026 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 10, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, Appellee Louis Vuitton Malletier, FILED. [Entered: 05/06/2026 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Letter, at docket entry 8, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, FILED. [Entered: 05/06/2026 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 14 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Xiaole Lin, FILED. Service date 05/04/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/04/2026 11:57 PM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Xiaole Lin, FILED. Service date 05/04/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/04/2026 05:14 PM] |
| Filing 12 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Xiaole Lin, FILED. Service date 05/04/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/04/2026 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER, dated 05/04/2026, requesting to terminate counsel, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, Appellee Louis Vuitton Malletier, RECEIVED. Service date 05/04/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, Appellee Louis Vuitton Malletier, FILED. Service date 05/04/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, FILED. [Entered: 05/04/2026 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 8 LETTER, dated 04/30/2026, requesting to terminate counsel, on behalf of Appellee Christian Dior Couture SA, RECEIVED. Service date 04/30/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/30/2026 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Christian Dior Couture SA, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTE: See lead case, 26-976, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Xiaole Lin, OPENED. [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Xiaole Lin, district court receipt # ANYSDC32712210, FILED. [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER DENYING RULE 60(B) MOTIONS, dated 03/19/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Xiaole Lin, FILED. [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
