State of New York v. United States Department of Transportation
| STATE OF NEW YORK and NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, SEAN DUFFY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation, FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and DEREK BARRS, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration |
| 26-1097 |
| April 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, FILED [Entered: 06/22/2026 07:15 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF AGENCY DEFAULT, for failure to file record on appeal, SENT. [Entered: 06/12/2026 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Bradley Hinshelwood, for Respondent Derek Barrs, Respondent Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Respondent Sean Duffy, Respondent United States Department of Transportation, ADDED. [Entered: 06/05/2026 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Derek Barrs, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Sean Duffy, United States Department of Transportation, FILED. [Entered: 06/05/2026 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 11 NEW CASE MANAGER, Elizabeth Munoz, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 05/14/2026 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner State of New York, Petitioner New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, FILED. Service date 05/08/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/08/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner State of New York, Petitioner New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, FILED. Service date 04/30/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/30/2026 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Respondent United States Department of Transportation, Respondent Sean Duffy, Respondent Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Respondent Derek Barrs, FILED. Service date 04/29/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/29/2026 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to expedite appeal at docket entry 6, on behalf of Petitioner New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Petitioner State of New York. The appeal shall proceed as follows: Respondent's Administrative Record shall be filed by 06/22/2026; Petitioner's brief is due 06/06/2026; Respondent's brief is due by 08/20/2026; Petitioner's reply brief is due by 08/31/2026; and oral argument shal be held as early as September 2026, subject to approval of the Presiding Judge, by SJM, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to expedite appeal, on behalf of Petitioner State of New York, Petitioner New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, FILED. Service date 04/24/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/24/2026 07:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 04/24/2026 04:59 PM] [Edited: 04/24/2026 06:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Petitioner State of New York, OPENED. [Entered: 04/24/2026 04:54 PM] [Edited: 04/24/2026 06:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Petitioner State of New York, USCA receipt # A02-4260-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 04/24/2026 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 04/16/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/24/2026 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Petitioner State of New York, FILED. [Entered: 04/24/2026 04:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
