Khan v. New York City
| RAFFIQUE N. KHAN |
| CITY OF NEW YORK, NYPD Officer MATTHEW S. BESSEN, NYPD Officer JOSEPH ASTARITA, P.O. NOAH NICHOLSON, P.O. PATRICK HUGHES, P.O. JOSEPH JACOBSEN, P.O. THOMAS COSTIGAN, P.O. JEISON JARA, P.O. MOHAMED ELDIASTY, Mayor of NYC ERIC ADAMS, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Police Commissioner EDWARD A. CABAN, Deputy Commissioner MICHAEL GERBER, Inspector ROHAN GRIFFITH, NYPD Officers JOHN AND JANE DOE NOS. 1-10, involved in the imprisonment of Raffique N. Khan and NYPD employees JOHN AND JANE DOE NOS. 1-10, of DG_LIC-Incidents, DG_LIC-Hearings-Appeals," involved in refusing to return the firearms unlawfully seized from Raffique N. Khan |
| 26-1201 |
| May 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Raffique N. Khan, OPENED. [Entered: 05/01/2026 06:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 05/01/2026 06:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Raffique N. Khan, district court receipt # ANYEDC20169044, FILED. [Entered: 05/01/2026 06:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/07/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/01/2026 06:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, dated 04/06/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/01/2026 06:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Raffique N. Khan, FILED. [Entered: 05/01/2026 06:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.