Wells v. King
| CARL D. WELLS |
| Superintendent M. KING, Clinton C.F. |
| 26-1340 |
| May 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, at docket entry 17, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [26-1340, 25-2962] [Entered: 07/02/2026 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION, for leave to file supplementary papers, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, FILED. Service date 06/18/2026 by United States Mail. [26-1340, 25-2962] [Entered: 07/02/2026 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 16 PAPERS, Letter dated 06/14/2026, to Judge Livingston, Exhibit to letter, RECEIVED. [25-2962, 26-1340] [Entered: 06/24/2026 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 15 PAPERS, Duplicate Form D-P and Certificate of service, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/03/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, to proceed informa pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, FILED. Service date 05/18/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/02/2026 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, FILED. Service date 05/18/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/02/2026 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, FILED. Service date 05/25/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/01/2026 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE, Case Status, SENT. [Entered: 05/27/2026 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER, dated 05/19/2026, requesting Form D-P, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, RECEIVED. Service date 05/26/2026 by No Service. [Entered: 05/27/2026 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Paul Bernard Lyons, in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 05/21/2026 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of M. King, FILED. [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTE: See lead case, 25-2962, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 05/14/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 05/14/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, OPENED. [Entered: 05/14/2026 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 05/14/2026 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/29/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/14/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 04/28/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/14/2026 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Carl D. Wells, FILED. [Entered: 05/14/2026 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wells v. King | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CARL D. WELLS | |
| Represented By: | Carl D. Wells |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Superintendent M. KING, Clinton C.F. | |
| Represented By: | Barbara D. Underwood |
| Represented By: | Paul Bernard Lyons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
