Hueston v. Rickard
| HARRY HUESTON |
| E. RICKARD |
| 26-1363 |
| May 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Harry Hueston, OPENED. [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 03/31/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Harry Hueston, FILED. [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hueston v. Rickard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: HARRY HUESTON | |
| Represented By: | Harry Hueston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: E. RICKARD | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin H. Torrance |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
