Williams v. United States of America
Plaintiff: LAQUAN WILLIAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, ANDREW CHAN, Assistant United States Attorney sued solely in his official capacity for prospective equitable relief, RYAN WOLFE ALLISON, Assistant United States Attorney sued solely in his official capacity for prospective equitable relief, DOMINIC GENTILE, Assistant United States Attorney sued solely in his official capacity for prospective equitable relief and JARED D. HOFFMAN, Assistant United States Attorney sued solely in his official capacity for prospective equitable relief
Case Number: 26-1479
Filed: May 29, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: PRISONER PET-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER, dated 07/20/2026, stating this appeal may be dismissed by 08/10/2026, unless Appellant Laquan WIlliams submits a Prisoner Authorization Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 03:53 PM]
July 14, 2026 Filing 30 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 27, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 07:31 PM]
July 14, 2026 Filing 29 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, at entry 26, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 07:23 PM]
July 14, 2026 Filing 28 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 25, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 07:22 PM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 31 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, informing Court of proposed due date 06/15/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 06/15/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 07/14/2026 07:41 PM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 27 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/15/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 07/14/2026 07:17 PM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 26 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/15/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 07/14/2026 07:07 PM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 25 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/15/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 07/14/2026 07:06 PM]
June 25, 2026 Filing 24 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 20, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 06/25/2026 08:08 PM]
June 25, 2026 Filing 23 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, at docket entry 19, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 06/25/2026 07:47 PM]
June 25, 2026 Filing 22 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 18, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 06/25/2026 07:34 PM]
June 23, 2026 Filing 21 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, informing Court of proposed due date 06/15/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 06/15/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:13 PM]
June 23, 2026 Filing 20 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/23/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:09 PM]
June 23, 2026 Filing 19 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/15/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/23/2026 08:57 PM]
June 23, 2026 Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/15/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/23/2026 08:51 PM]
June 12, 2026 Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, Appellee United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, Appellee Andrew Chan, Appellee Ryan Wolfe Allison, Appellee Dominic Gentile, Appellee Jared D. Hoffman, FILED. Service date 06/12/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/12/2026 06:02 PM]
June 12, 2026 Filing 16 LETTER, dated 06/12/2026, regaridng non-appearance, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, Appellee United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, Appellee Andrew Chan, Appellee Ryan Wolfe Allison, Appellee Dominic Gentile, Appellee Jared D. Hoffman, RECEIVED. Service date 06/12/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/12/2026 05:59 PM] [Edited: 06/15/2026 01:50 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 Scheduling Notification, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:27 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 10, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:19 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, at docket entry 9, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:15 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 8, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:12 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 11 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, informing Court of proposed due date 06/03/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 06/03/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:02 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/03/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/10/2026 04:52 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 9 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/03/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/10/2026 04:43 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. Service date 06/03/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/10/2026 04:42 PM]
May 29, 2026 Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 05/29/2026 08:14 AM]
May 29, 2026 Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 05/29/2026 08:11 AM]
May 29, 2026 Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, OPENED. [Entered: 05/29/2026 08:07 AM]
May 27, 2026 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 05/29/2026 08:03 AM]
May 27, 2026 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/04/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/29/2026 08:00 AM]
May 27, 2026 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 04/29/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/29/2026 07:58 AM]
May 27, 2026 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Laquan Williams, FILED. [Entered: 05/29/2026 07:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Williams v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAQUAN WILLIAMS
Represented By: Laquan Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Benjamin H. Torrance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Represented By: Benjamin H. Torrance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW CHAN, Assistant United States Attorney sued solely in his official capacity for prospective equitable relief
Represented By: Benjamin H. Torrance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RYAN WOLFE ALLISON, Assistant United States Attorney sued solely in his official capacity for prospective equitable relief
Represented By: Benjamin H. Torrance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOMINIC GENTILE, Assistant United States Attorney sued solely in his official capacity for prospective equitable relief
Represented By: Benjamin H. Torrance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JARED D. HOFFMAN, Assistant United States Attorney sued solely in his official capacity for prospective equitable relief
Represented By: Benjamin H. Torrance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?