Lewis v. Paymaster Payroll Systems, Inc.
| SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS |
| PAYMASTER PAYROLL SYSTEMS, INC., JOSEPH POMPO, KENNETH CARDARELLI, ADRIENNE POMPO and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
| 26-1526 |
| June 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Americans w/Disibilities Act-O |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NEW PARTIES, Appellee Adrienne Pompo, Appellee Internal Revenue Service, ADDED. ATTORNEY, Rajit Singh Dosanjh, for Appellee Internal Revenue Service, ADDED. [Entered: 06/03/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/03/2026 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 9 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellees Joseph Pompo, Kenneth Cardarelli, SENT. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant Scott Phillip Lewis, SENT. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE, to Paymaster Payroll Systems, Inc., regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Scott Phillip Lewis, OPENED. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/19/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 05/19/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Scott Phillip Lewis, FILED. [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.