Etuk v. Camba Inc.
| AKANIYENE WILLIAM ETUK |
| CAMBA INC., ARROW SECURITY INC., CUMMBERBATCH, CITY OF NEW YORK, KINGS COUNTY HOSPITAL CENTER, ANIMAL CARE CENTERS OF NYC and JOHN DOE PARTNERS |
| 26-1611 |
| June 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE, to Camba Inc, Arrow Security Inc., Kings County Hospital Center, Animal Care Centers of NYC, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 06/11/2026 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 8 NEW PARTY, Defendant-Appellee John Doe Partners, ADDED. [Entered: 06/11/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 06/11/2026 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Akaniyene William Etuk, OPENED. [Entered: 06/11/2026 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2026 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 05/29/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/11/2026 10:01 AM] [Edited: 06/11/2026 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/15/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/11/2026 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER DISMISSING CASE, entered in the district court as docket dated 05/14/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/11/2026 09:57 AM] [Edited: 06/11/2026 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Akaniyene William Etuk, FILED. [Entered: 06/11/2026 09:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
