Laster v. Ritter
| KEITH LASTER |
| Superintendent RITTER |
| 26-1636 |
| June 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 06/15/2026 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION, for Second or Successive habeas petition, on behalf of Keith Laster, OPENED. Notice to Keith Laster, requiring filing of application form for second or successive petition, SENT. [Entered: 06/15/2026 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE APPLICATION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF, transferred from U.S. District Court, on behalf of Keith Laster, FILED. [Entered: 06/15/2026 12:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Laster v. Ritter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: KEITH LASTER | |
| Represented By: | Keith Laster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Superintendent RITTER | |
| Represented By: | Barbara D. Underwood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
