Keita v. Bashiroy
| MOHAMMED KEITA |
| NAZIM BASHIROY, ALEX, Owners of UNITED LAND REALTY, INC., SECURITY and ALL EMPLOYEES' PRESENT ON DUTY ON DAY OF FIRE |
| 26-1667 |
| June 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other Statutes - Other Statutory Action |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER, dated 08/13/2026, dismissing appeal by 09/03/2026, unless Appellant Mohammed Keita, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis status, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 08/13/2026 07:42 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER, dated 08/13/2026, dismissing appeal by 09/03/2026, unless Appellant Mohammed Keita, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 08/13/2026 07:36 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER, dated 08/13/2026, dismissing appeal by 09/03/2026, unless Appellant Mohammed Keita, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 08/13/2026 07:29 PM] [Edited: 08/13/2026 07:33 PM]
|
| Filing 16 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at entry 14, on behalf of Appellee Nazim Bashiroy, Appellee United Land Realty, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 08/06/2026 05:54 PM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Daniele C. Marotta, for Appellee Nazim Bashiroy, Appellee United Land Realty, Inc., ADDED. [Entered: 08/06/2026 05:52 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Nazim Bashiroy, United Land Realty, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 08/04/2026 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Appellee Nazim Bashiroy, Appellee United Land Realty, Inc., Appellee Security, Appellee All Employees' Present on Duty on Day of Fire, FILED. [Entered: 07/22/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at docket entry 10, on behalf of Appellee Nazim Bashiroy, Appellee United Land Realty, Inc., Appellee Security, Appellee All Employees' Present on Duty on Day of Fire, FILED. [Entered: 07/22/2026 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Security, Nazim Bashiroy, United Land Realty, Inc., All Employees' Present on Duty on Day of Fire, FILED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Security, Nazim Bashiroy, United Land Realty, Inc., All Employees' Present on Duty on Day of Fire, FILED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE, to Appellee United Land Realty, Inc., for failure to file an appearance, copy to pro se appellee, SENT. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE, to Nazim Bashiroy, for failure to file an appearance, SENT. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:09 AM] [Edited: 07/14/2026 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE, to United Land Realty, Inc., regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 06/22/2026 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 06/22/2026 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 5 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Richard M. Gabor, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 06/22/2026 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Mohammed Keita, OPENED. [Entered: 06/18/2026 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/18/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 06/04/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/18/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Mohammed Keita, FILED. [Entered: 06/18/2026 01:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
