Kraemer v. Doe 1 through 1,630
| THOMAS D. KRAEMER |
| JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 1,630, JOHN DOE ORGANIZATION, AID: BBMjQHOv and AID: BBMFPQQP |
| 26-1677 |
| June 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other Statutes - Other Statutory Action |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 6, on behalf of Appellant Thomas D. Kraemer, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, at docket entry 5, on behalf of Appellant Thomas D. Kraemer, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Thomas D. Kraemer, OPENED. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Thomas D. Kraemer, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Thomas D. Kraemer, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 06/02/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651, dated 05/28/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Thomas D. Kraemer, FILED. [Entered: 06/22/2026 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
