United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ahmed
| UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| SHALINI AHMED, -, IFTIKAR A. AHMED, -, IFTIKAR ALI AHMED SOLE PROP, I-CUBED DOMAINS, LLC, SHALINI AHMED 2014 GRANTOR RETAINED ANNUNITY TRUST, DIYA HOLDINGS LLC, DIYA REAL HOLDINGS, LLC, I. I. 1, A minor child, by and through his next friends Iftikar and Shalini Ahmed, his parents, I. I. 2, A minor child, by and through his next friends Iftikar and Shalini Ahmed, his parents and I. I. 3, A minor child, by and through his next friends Iftikar and Shalini Ahmed, his parents |
| NMR ETAILING, LLC |
| STEPHEN M. KINDSETH |
| 26-1811 |
| July 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| STATUTES-Secur Comm Exchange |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 37 NEW CASE MANAGER, Connie Mazariego, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 09/02/2026 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 36 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for stay, at docket entry 153, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. [24-3099, 24-3124, 24-3188, 24-3224, 25-790, 25-1410, 26-1300, 26-1304, 26-1811] [Entered: 08/26/2026 08:31 PM] |
| Filing 35 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 08/24/2026, to DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN), ISSUED. [24-3099, 24-3188, 24-3224, 25-790, 25-1410, 26-1300, 26-1304, 26-1811] [Entered: 08/24/2026 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 34 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for stay of disruption of assests pending appeal and the temporary stay is vacated, at docket entry 59, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, by MP, MAK, FILED. [24-3099, 24-3188, 24-3224, 25-790, 25-1410, 26-1300, 26-1304, 26-1811] [Entered: 08/24/2026 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 33 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for an administrative stay of the district courts 07/10/2026 order imposing a monetary sanction and panel review of this Court's 08/07/2026 order denying an administrative stay at docket entry 144 in 24-3099 (L), and entry 29 in 26-1811 (Con), on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, by AJN, FILED. [24-3099, 24-3124, 24-3188, 24-3224, 25-790, 25-1410, 26-649, 26-1300, 26-1304, 26-1354, 26-1811] [Entered: 08/12/2026 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 32 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Reply to Opposition, at entry 30, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. [Entered: 08/12/2026 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 31 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Reply to Opposition, at docket entry 30, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 30 REPLY TO OPPOSITION, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. Service date 08/10/2026 by ACMS. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 08/10/2026 09:16 PM] [Edited: 08/12/2026 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 29 EMERGENCY MOTION, for panel review of order denying temporary administrative stay of enforcement of contempt sanction, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. Service date 08/10/2026 by ACMS. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 08/10/2026 04:27 PM] [Edited: 08/11/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 28 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 08/07/2026, to DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN), ISSUED. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 08/07/2026 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 27 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for temporary administrative stay of enforcement of monetary sanction, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, by AJN, FILED. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 08/07/2026 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 26 REPLY TO OPPOSITION, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. Service date 08/05/2026 by ACMS. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 08/05/2026 11:18 PM] |
| Filing 25 OPPOSITION, to Emergency Motion for temporary administrative stay of enforcement of contempt sanction, at docket entry 23, on behalf of Appellee Stephen M. Kindseth, FILED. Service date 08/05/2026 by ACMS. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 08/05/2026 05:08 PM] [Edited: 08/06/2026 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 24 OPPOSITION, to Motion to stay contempt sanction, at docket entry 22, on behalf of Appellee Stephen M. Kindseth, FILED. Service date 08/05/2026 by ACMS. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 08/05/2026 05:08 PM] [Edited: 08/06/2026 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 23 EMERGENCY MOTION, for temporary administrative stay of enforcement of contempt sanction, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. Service date 07/27/2026 by ACMS. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 07/27/2026 10:28 PM] [Edited: 07/29/2026 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 22 MOTION, to stay contempt sanction, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. Service date 07/27/2026 by ACMS. [26-1811, 24-3099] [Entered: 07/27/2026 10:10 PM] [Edited: 07/28/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 21 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 07/23/2026, to DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN), ISSUED. [24-3099, 24-3124, 24-3188, 24-3224, 25-790, 25-1410, 26-649, 26-1300, 26-1304, 26-1354, 26-1811] [Entered: 07/23/2026 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for an administrative stay of the district courts May 8, 2026 clarification order. at docket entry 110, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, by ECL, FILED. [24-3099, 24-3124, 24-3188, 24-3224, 25-790, 25-1410, 26-649, 26-1300, 26-1304, 26-1354, 26-1811] [Entered: 07/23/2026 04:21 PM] [Edited: 07/23/2026 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 19 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, district court receipt #2847G6IS, FILED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY, John Louis Cesaroni, for Appellee Stephen M. Kindseth, ADDED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY, Stephen G. Yoder, for Appellee United States Securities & Exchange Commission, ADDED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. Service date 07/15/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 15 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. Service date 07/15/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Stephen M. Kindseth, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Stephen M. Kindseth, FILED. Service date 07/13/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/13/2026 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States Securities & Exchange Commission, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 11 DISTRICT COURT ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS ON RELIEF DEFENDANT SHALINI AHMED, dated 07/10/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/10/2026 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL, with copy of district court docket, on behalf of Shalini Ahmed, FILED. [Entered: 07/10/2026 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, at entry 114, in docket number 24-3099, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. [24-3099, 26-1354] [Entered: 07/08/2026 03:58 PM] [Edited: 07/09/2026 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, at docket entry 34, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [26-1354, 24-3099] [Entered: 07/08/2026 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTE: See lead case, 24-3099, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 07/07/2026 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 07/07/2026 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, OPENED. [Entered: 07/07/2026 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 07/07/2026 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 06/18/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/07/2026 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 05/04/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/07/2026 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Shalini Ahmed, FILED. [Entered: 07/07/2026 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
