United States of America v. Morrow?Wu
Defendant: SHANGZHEN WU, MATTHEW MORROWWU, Daniel Wu, Matthew Blake MorrowWu, Matthew Blake Morrow and Blake Wu
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 26-1881
Filed: July 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 07:29 PM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Jerry Fang, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [26-1881] [Entered: 07/13/2026 11:56 AM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 11:21 AM] [Edited: 07/13/2026 11:52 AM]
July 10, 2026 Filing 4 NOTE: See lead case, 26-1752, containing complete set of docket entries. [26-1881] [Entered: 07/10/2026 03:53 PM]
July 10, 2026 Filing 3 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Matthew MorrowWu, OPENED. [Entered: 07/10/2026 03:51 PM]
July 8, 2026 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 06/23/2026, RECEIVED. [26-1881] [Entered: 07/10/2026 03:45 PM]
July 8, 2026 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Matthew MorrowWu, FILED. [Entered: 07/10/2026 03:42 PM] [Edited: 07/10/2026 03:46 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Morrow?Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHANGZHEN WU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTHEW MORROWWU
Represented By: Eric I Prusan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Blake MorrowWu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Blake Morrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blake Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Nathan Rehn
Represented By: Jerry Fang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?