Burns v. Coe
| GEORGE E. BURNS |
| SAMUEL S. COE, County Law 18TB and 722 LAWYER, Westchester County |
| 26-1889 |
| July 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to file a late appeal, at docket entry 6, on behalf of Appellant George E. Burns, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 5, on behalf of Appellant George E. Burns, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 8 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 7 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant George E. Burns, OPENED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to file a late appeal, on behalf of Appellant George E. Burns, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant George E. Burns, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/10/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 02/05/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant George E. Burns, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
