Digital Currency Group, Inc. v. McGreevy
| DIGITAL CURRENCY GROUP, INC., BARRY SILBERT, MICHAEL KRAINES, MARK MURPHY, SOICHIRO MICHAEL MORO and DERAR ISLIM |
| WILLIAM MCGREEVY, ASHWIN GOWDA, TRANSLUNAR CRYPTO LP, CHRISTOPHER BUTTENHAM, REMO MARIA MORONE, DOMINIC MACRI, LARRY WIENER, DEREK WILSON, DANIEL AMELI and LEE JACOBSON |
| 26-1896 |
| July 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Ian Wise Sloss, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 6 Petition for leave to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b), on behalf of Digital Currency Group, Inc., Barry Silbert, Michael Kraines, Mark Murphy, Soichiro Michael Moro, Derar Islim, OPENED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:17 AM] [Edited: 07/14/2026 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 5 DOCKET SHEET, RECEIVED [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT ORDER ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL, dated 07/02/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER ON MOTION FOR REVISION TO INTERLOCUTORY RULING, dated 07/02/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT RULING AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS, dated 02/24/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION, for leave to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292b, on behalf of Digital Currency Group, Inc., Barry Silbert, Michael Kraines, Mark Murphy, Soichiro Michael Moro, Derar Islim, FILED. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
