In Re: Sylvester Dziennik
| SYLVESTER DZIENNIK, MIECZYSLAW KIERSZTYN, RICHARD FELSKOWSKI and FERDYNAND KOBIEROWSKI, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated |
| SEALIFT INC., FORTUNE MARITIME, INC., SAGAMORE SHIPPING, INC. and VICTORY MARITIME, INC. |
| 26-1909 |
| July 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, SERVED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Gordon Scott Arnott, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 DOCKET SHEET, RECEIVED [Entered: 07/15/2026 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, on behalf of Sylvester Dziennik, Mieczyslaw Kiersztyn, Richard Felskowski, Ferdynand Kobierowski, OPENED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Sylvester Dziennik, Mieczyslaw Kiersztyn, Richard Felskowski, Ferdynand Kobierowski, USCA receipt # A02-4459-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPENDIX TO ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, on behalf of Sylvester Dziennik, Mieczyslaw Kiersztyn, Richard Felskowski, Ferdynand Kobierowski, FILED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 09:48 AM] [Edited: 07/15/2026 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, on behalf of Sylvester Dziennik, Mieczyslaw Kiersztyn, Richard Felskowski, Ferdynand Kobierowski, FILED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 09:48 AM] [Edited: 07/15/2026 09:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
