United States of America v. Babulal
| JOEL BABULAL, TAMEKA BABULAL, Joel Nical Babulal, Tameka Williams, Sharniece Williams and Meek Williams |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-1911 |
| July 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NEW CASE MANAGER, Chasidy Lopez, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 07/16/2026 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Siobhan C. Atkins, for Appellant Tameka Babulal, ADDED. [Entered: 07/16/2026 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Tameka Babulal, FILED. [Entered: 07/16/2026 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Reyhan Watson, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 07/16/2026 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 04:30 PM] [Edited: 07/16/2026 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 6 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Tameka Babulal, FILED. Service date 07/15/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/15/2026 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Tameka Babulal, FILED. Service date 07/15/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/15/2026 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 4 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Tameka Babulal, OPENED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/01/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Tameka Babulal, FILED. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:28 AM] [Edited: 07/15/2026 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.