Rainey v. Ortyl
| KENNETH RAINEY |
| A.D.A. ELAINE ORTYL, Judge CURTIS FARBER, D.A. BRIAN O'KEEFE KENNEDY, PARKCHESTER NORTH CONDOMINIUM, PARKCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and Detective THOMAS, 32nd Pct. |
| 26-1963 |
| July 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 3, on behalf of Appellant Kenneth Rainey, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE, to Parkchester North Condominium, Parkchester Police Department, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Kenneth Rainey, OPENED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Kenneth Rainey, FILED. Service date 07/07/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO REPLEAD, dated 10/10/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Kenneth Rainey, FILED. [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
