Matthews v. Field Office Director
| GERARD PATRICK MATTHEWS |
| FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, New York Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 26-1988 |
| July 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus-Alien Detainee |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for stay of removal, at docket entry 8, on behalf of Appellant Gerard Patrick Matthews, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 8 EMERGENCY MOTION, for stay of removal, on behalf of Appellant Gerard Patrick Matthews, FILED. Service date 07/17/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:18 PM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Gerard Patrick Matthews, OPENED. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Gerard Patrick Matthews, district court receipt # 50493, FILED. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/07/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 07/06/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Gerard Patrick Matthews, FILED. [Entered: 07/21/2026 05:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
